Intimidating sports colors

Behavioral theorists often see threatening behaviours as a consequence of being threatened by others, including parents, authority figures, playmates and siblings.

"Use of force is justified when a person reasonably believes that it is necessary for the defense of oneself or another against the immediate use of unlawful force." Intimidation may be employed consciously or unconsciously, and a percentage of people who employ it consciously may do so as the result of selfishly rationalized notions of its appropriation, utility or self-empowerment.

Webb claimed Douglas’ outfit — and that of the entire U. As he also points out in that article, the research has a twist ending — one “that serves as a timely reminder that we should always be wary of neat explanations for psychological phenomena.”Like Stafford, I think it's this aspect of the research — particularly its lesson that correlation and causation in scientific studies are two very different things — that makes it most interesting.

It was found out that there was no flies in the blue section, and a great many in the red section.Because of the way the studies were designed, they could show only a correlation between the color of the clothes the athletes competed in and their eventual wins or losses.The studies could not prove that wearing a paricular color caused their chances of winning to improve.It may seem strange to identify a sensation of temperature with the visual realm of colour sensation.However, the experiments have demonstrated the a difference of five to seven degrees in the subjective feeling of heat or cold between a work room painted in blue- green and one painted in red-orange.

Leave a Reply